Talk:Treehouse (Drake and Josh episode)

No, no need
Page stays on here. I'm recreating this page. ForestH2
 * I don't think you're allowed to do this after the Afd result was redirect -- Hirudo 15:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Indeed. If you wish to include an overview of the episode, with a verifiable source, why not create Drake and Josh series 4 as I suggested to you and merge verifiable information from the relevant articles (which, like this, could become redirects).└ UkPaolo/talk┐ 16:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Oh well.....At least I have it as one of my user subpages....though I wish we had it here. ForestH2
 * Please stop trying to put it back here -- Hirudo 01:48, 3 June 2006 (UTC)


 * They better be back on here when the episode airs. ForestH2


 * I've created this page again as there is no reason it should be deleted. ForestH2
 * Follow process please, don't unilaterally make decisions like that -- Hirudo 00:10, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * And creating it under a different name (Treehouse (Drake & Josh episode)) is inappropriate as well.--Ezeu 01:03, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmmm...I don't see how it's inappropriate. But I think because of this very unneeded and maybe even stupid discussion I've had enough of this encylopedia ForestH2


 * Because there was a consensus on Afd to redirect. I'm not sure what's unclear to you. If a consensus is reached on Afd or similar pages, rejecting that consensus is not something an individual user should do. If you want the page to be restored, you should seek a new consensus, not ignore the current result -- Hirudo 03:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Furthermore I think this encylopedia is going no where at all, and I hope maybe sometime I'll think different. I am quite fed up with why we need this page deleted and I'm about to think about leaving Wikipedia. ForestH2


 * I almost agree with you. The amount of non-encylopedic stuff that is in here nowadays (such as articles about individual TV episodes) is discouraging. But that's just my opinion and enough people disagree with it that most episode articles are kept. That's somewhat irrelevant for this discussion though. -- Hirudo 03:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm not going to fiddle with this page no more. --ForestH2


 * Thank you -- Hirudo 03:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)