Talk:Treehouse of Horror (The Simpsons episode)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hold. The nominator never put a nomination link on the talk page, the entire opening sentence has no references when there are a couple things that require references. Plot is a little cluttering. Production section too trivial and too long ISTHnR | Knock Knock  &#124; Who's There? 05:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking a look, but can you be a bit more specific? For example, what needs to be referenced in the lead? And can you give an example of trivial information in the production section? :)  The Le ft ori um  09:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * There are two schools of thought when it comes to references in the lead. Some feel there should be no refs if it info that has a reference in the body, and some prefer refs even when it is ref'ed in the body.  I don't care either way.  If you want, I can ref every statement in the lead, or just specific ones, or none; up to you.  I'm willing to cut the production section and work on the plot, but I would appreciate a little more direction so I know I'm going in the correct direction.  Thanks. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 18:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, I can see now about the references not being needed, and further review of the production section, I can see it now. I would say the the article is ready for good article status. By the way, I am the original reviewer, since the reviews I've changed my name and signature ( verify ) --- Scarce  ||||  You shouldn't have buried me,   I'm not dead --- 02:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

GA ready!
The article has...
 * An excellent, 3 paragraphed opening section
 * Supporting material (infobox, photo)
 * 3 very informative sections
 * Short yet very detailed plot section
 * Very informative, in sequence infobox
 * Great External links
 * WikiQuote box, portal link, navigation box
 * Reliable references
 * Appropriate amount of internal links

--- Scarce  ||||  You shouldn't have buried me,   I'm not dead --- 02:32, 25 June 2009 (UTC)