Talk:Trees (poem)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 1ST7 (talk · contribs) 01:12, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

I'll review this nomination. Initial comments should be posted within the next 24 hours. --1ST7 (talk) 01:12, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

I did some minor copyediting; I hope you don't mind. Here's the review:
 * 1) Well-written
 * One issue with Manual of Style/Words to watch: "Ironically, Kenton Kilmer points out that while his father was..." Please reword this phrase.
 * Done (09SEP13) replaced "points out" with "stated" per MOS--ColonelHenry (talk) 17:20, 9 September 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Verifiable with no original research:
 * The last two sentences in the second paragraph of "popular appeal" need a citation.
 * '''Addressed (09SEP13) - removed editorial judgment. --ColonelHenry (talk) 17:22, 9 September 2013 (UTC)


 * This also needs a citation: "Despite this, the popular appeal of "Trees" continues—much to the chagrin of critics."
 * Addressed (09SEP13) - removed sentence that was an editorial judgment.--ColonelHenry (talk) 17:20, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Aside from these few things, the article looks ready for promotion. These issues shouldn't take long to fix, so I don't think it's necessary to put the article on hold. Thanks for your work! --1ST7 (talk) 05:46, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Broad in its coverage:
 * 2) Neutral:
 * 3) Stable:
 * 4) Illustrated, if possible, by images:

Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article. Congratulations, and thanks again for your work. --1ST7 (talk) 23:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC)