Talk:Treloar Copyright Bill

Untitled
I'm confused...why was this tagged for anything? It's based on congressional records and my own primary source research for a larger scholarly paper.


 * I don't know. Ask the person who added it. If they don't respond, you can probably safely remove the notice. 68.39.174.238 00:29, 6 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I removed the notability tag, since it seems notable to me, but it'd be nice if some references were added, particularly if there are any existing mentions in widely available secondary sources. --Delirium 04:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

There's a short contemporary newspaper account in the Washington Post of March 4, 1896, but it requires subscription to read more than the first paragraph: --Delirium 18:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Alright, added the proper source. The third section of the article contains over 100 footnotes for the points asserted here.