Talk:Trey Burke/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Moisejp (talk · contribs) 07:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I'll be reviewing this article for GA. I'll probably be able to finish it within the next few days. Moisejp (talk) 07:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

No disambiguation links or dead links. Moisejp (talk) 07:50, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Well written, follows MOS,
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Refs all check out, no OR.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Broad and focused.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * NPOV.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Stable.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * No images
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Very good article. Congratulations! It is now a GA. Moisejp (talk) 06:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)