Talk:Treyarch

Untitled
For the games made of in production it says call of duty 4 there is no fact to this and mostly all rumours even though i will not add the,mm say infinity ward will develop it.

I am removing the information about Treyarch now being the sole CoD developer, and the information regarding Infinity Ward being disbanded, due to contradictions given on the page for Infinity Ward. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.198.28 (talk) 01:31, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm deleting the entry of Call of Duty: United Offensive off of the list of games they've developed. They had no hand whatsoever in the game's development. For some reason they list Call of Duty: United Offensive on their website under the list of games but it must just be for posterity. Their name doesn't appear anywhere on the game's box, instruction manual or any credible game review website. Sovetskeey (talk) 02:48, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

(CALL OF DUTY: UNITED OFFENSIVE WAS DEVELOPED BY GREY MATTER INTERACTIVE, WHICH WAS THEN EVENTUALLY MERGED INTO TREYARCH, SO ITS VERY LIKELY TREYARCH EMPLOYEES MAY HAVE WORKED ON COD:UO) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.152.67.131 (talk) 00:52, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

No one has confirmed that they are developing Call of Duty 5, so I'm deleting it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.175.203 (talk) 23:41, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Concurring with the above poster, since there has not been any confirmation nor citation that Treyarch will be developing COD5, it gets deleted. pyrocrickett (talk) 20:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Until there is a credible source, don't put that Treyarch is developing Call of Duty 5.

They developed Call of Duty 5. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.235.135.66 (talk) 02:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

PC
Why was my information on bad PC ports removed? Many PC gamers complained about the lack of quality put into the port. I request it not be taken out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Varthon (talk • contribs) 03:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)


 * It was taken out because it was not referenced to a reliable source. Negative or critical information must be well sourced to remain in an article.-- Kubigula (talk) 05:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)