Talk:Triaenops menamena/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  11:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Just two comments
 * angular process is red-linked and unexplained
 * Added a little explanation.
 * In the lead, you illustrate the sizes with wing lengths &mdash; I'd expect total length to be the more obvious figure, but I know nothing about bats.
 * In bats, forearm length is among the most prominent measurements. I can also replace it with total length if needed, though; it's already in the table. Ucucha 13:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

 Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  11:53, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing. Ucucha 13:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: