Talk:Triangular distribution

The article says: a (location), b (scale) and c (shape) are the triangular distribution parameters. I would have said that c was a more natural location parameter as the mode, b&minus;a the scale (or range and something like $$\frac{a+b-2c}{2(b-a)}$$ best for the shape, being related to the idea of skewness. --Henrygb 03:31, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Kurtosis and kurtosis of Triangular distribution?
The kurtosis excess given 12/5 appears to be the 'true' kurtosis?

[@http://mathworld.wolfram.com/TriangularDistribution.html Wolfram ]give the kurtosis excess as -3/5.

which suggests that the value given as excess is in fact the 'true' excess 12/5 (kurtosis excess + 3 = 15/5 -3/5 = 12/5)

Paul A Bristow 18:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Paul A Bristow


 * Right, thanks. Its fixed. PAR 19:31, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Formulae for pdf cause divide by zero if a or b = mode
Formulae for pdf cause divide by zero if a or b = c (the mode) (c-a = 0 if c == a). This are the two right angle triagle cases.

In these cases the value is the apex value of 2/(b-a)?

Should this specified separately?

Paul A Bristow 10:27, 11 December 2006 (UTC) Paul A Bristow


 * With the formulation
 * $$f(x|a,b,c)=\left\{

\begin{matrix} \frac{2(x-a)}{(b-a)(c-a)} & \mathrm{for\ } a \le x \le c \\ & \\ \frac{2(b-x)}{(b-a)(b-c)} & \mathrm{for\ } c \le x \le b                     \end{matrix} \right. $$
 * when c=a the first form produces your problem, but the second is fine, even for x=c. I wouldn't bother adding more. --Henrygb 11:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Paul is right−the pdf should look like this:
 * $$f(x|a,b,c)= \begin{cases}

0 & \mathrm{for\ } x < a, \\ \frac{2(x-a)}{(b-a)(c-a)} & \mathrm{for\ } a \le x < c, \\[4pt] \frac{2}{b-a}            & \mathrm{for\ } x = c, \\[4pt] \frac{2(b-x)}{(b-a)(b-c)} & \mathrm{for\ } c < x \le b, \\[4pt] 0 & \mathrm{for\ } b < x, \end{cases} $$
 * For the same reason, the cdf should be fixed: F(c) = (c-a) / (b-a).
 * I'll make these changes if nobody objects. -- UKoch (talk) 13:14, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Is the median correct?
I have a feeling that the two cases for the median should be separtated by c = (b+a)/2 rather than c = (b-a)/2 as given on the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.53.57.46 (talk) 09:09, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

I agree that the median formula does not appear to be correct. Does anyone have a link or reference for a derivation somewhere? 207.34.120.71 (talk) 20:40, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Link
Can somebody please create the page Triangular Distribution and redirect it here. I keep searching for that page, and get nothing every time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.91.171.36 (talk) 14:21, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

example should cite Bates distribution?
The mean of two standard uniform r.v.'s is called Bates(2), apparently.146.186.250.171 (talk) 17:28, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Unclear edit
In this edit, part of the article was changed to read as follows:
 * to model events which take place within an interval defined by a minimum, most often
 * and maximum value. The triangle distribution is better as it provide a more accurate statistics to complete the task in delay as well as early completion of a task which can be zero, unlike the normal distribution.

Is the following interpretation of the above correct?
 * to model events which take place within an interval defined by a minimum and maximum value. The triangle distribution is better suited than the normal distribution, as it provides a more accurate statistics if either the minimum or the maximum time needed to complete the task is equal to the most probable time.

-- UKoch (talk) 19:19, 29 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Better yet might be:
 * to model events which take place within an interval defined by a minimum and maximum value. The triangle distribution is better suited than the normal distribution, as it provides a more accurate statistics if either the minimum or the maximum time needed to complete the task is close or equal to the most probable time.
 * However, since it's not clear what was meant, I've undone the edit in question for the time being. -- UKoch (talk) 18:21, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Beamforming
Is the ref in question really about the triangular distribution? I highly doubt it. -- UKoch (talk) 18:28, 16 July 2021 (UTC)