Talk:Triangulum Australe/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: StringTheory11 (talk · contribs) 06:14, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

I'll review this article. StringTheory11 (t • c) 06:14, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * great! Casliber (talk · contribs) 22:08, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Some quick comments:


 * Check refs 22 and 24 for URL problems or dead links.
 * Weird. The hotlinks from the article titles of the two respective refs are working fine today....? Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:57, 22 September 2012 (UTC)


 * There are two refs in the ref section that do not appear to be connected to any footnotes. These should probably be moved into a further reading section or the like.
 * I just removed them. They are textbooks which are not any more integral to the understanding of the subject mattter at hand. I think they are from an early version with non-inlined refs Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:55, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

At a glance, the rest of the article appears to meet GA standards. I'll do a content review later. StringTheory11 (t • c) 02:16, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * It would be great if you could give it as bi a shove towards FAC as possible! So be as tough as you like. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:04, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Detailed review:


 * Characteristics:
 * North should not be capitalized.
 * typo; fixed now Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:43, 30 September 2012 (UTC)


 * What are the pointers? (I know the answer, but I don't think a random person reading the article would)
 * Tricky as there is no one place I can link to for that, so have spelt out the stars. Must rectify that somewhere down the track... Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:43, 30 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Notable features:
 * Probably shouldn't say that it is an equilateral triangle, as the illustration at the top contradicts this...
 * removed Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:43, 30 September 2012 (UTC)


 * History:
 * All good here!

Other than these few issues, the article appears to be GA-worthy. Short article, but there's not much else to write about the subject. StringTheory11 (t • c) 17:44, 30 September 2012 (UTC)