Talk:Trijicon biblical verses controversy

'Jesus rifles"?
Whose terminology is this? This article title requires a citation. I have marked it thus in the article. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:19, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Article name
I think we should move to Trijicon biblical verses controversy leaving Jesus rifles as a redirect. We are an encyclopaedia, not a tabloid journal. If folk feel strongly about leaving JR in the title it should be in parentheses.

Unless a consensus builds against this I propose to be bold in the next few days and to make the move to the emboldened title Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Since no-one objected I have been bold and made the move. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:32, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Be Bold!Naraht (talk) 18:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Apr&eacute;s consensus is good, too :) Fiddle Faddle (talk) 20:22, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Merge with Trijicon article
Why is this a seperate article? It should be a subheading of the main article on Trijicon.Lepeu1999 (talk) 18:06, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Because this turned out to be the tail that was bigger than the dog. If this was merged back into the article, then this information would be larger than the entire remainder of the article. In order to keep the Trijicon Article close to balanced, it was moved to a separate article.Naraht (talk) 21:34, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Source for possible research
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/archive/index.php/t-227297.html lists a number of them, but a forum isn't a good reference. Perhaps some of these can be researched and added.Naraht (talk) 13:22, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Order of inscriptions?
Does anyone have any ideas on the order that the inscriptions should be in for the table in the article. I'm mildly leaning for the order of the verses in the NIV (/KJV), but that's mild.Naraht (talk) 12:24, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Why these verses?
As the main article points out, "Trijicon specialize in self-luminous optics and night sights, mainly using the low-energy radioactive isotope tritium, light-gathering fiber optics, and batteries.", which helps explain why all of them but one refer to light, and the AccuPin exception is an unpowered fiber optic (light gathering) sight for a bow, hence the arrow reference. Without this context the company's policy looks inane; any suggestions on how to work this in? Hga (talk) 17:32, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * First of all, I can't find the mention of the accupin on the reference given for it, so we may have to delete it. The fact that the rest are based on light should be farther up in the article, but I'm pretty sure at least one of the references includes it.Naraht (talk) 14:47, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Order of the inscription table?
Any suggestions on how to order the table in the article with the inscriptions?Naraht (talk) 04:08, 4 July 2019 (UTC)