Talk:Trisdee na Patalung

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted because reasons given by nominator, a single purpose account, are completely bogus. He has attacked this page since registering yesterday. Patalung would probably easily survive an AfD, let alone a speedy deletion.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:19, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I have removed the speedy deletion request. I am not sure if this composer is notable or not, but this should at least be taken to AfD for discussion. --Deskford (talk) 20:33, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Having looked at the article and the references in more detail I would say he seems notable enough to merit coverage and the references appear reliable. The history of the article over the last day or so suggests the speedy deletion nomination was a further disruptive action by an editor with some unexplained objection to this article.  --Deskford (talk) 22:30, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time to look. You are spot on. I am trying to update the article with more information about his career plus sources. At this point, it's not clear to me that he's yet established worldwide fame, so most of the sources are Asian or European, and not along the lines of major capitals. Still, he's quite young, and I'm still looking.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:36, 21 August 2011 (UTC)