Talk:Troll Airfield/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Wackywace  converse 18:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * My only reservation about the article is the lack of images, but I understand that it would be incredibly difficult to get a free image of the airfield given its remote nature. I've added some links to external images, though, so I think that should suffice. Overall, for such an obscure airport, this is a detailed and well-written article.  Wackywace  converse 18:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking the time to review the article. Arsenikk (talk)  11:30, 18 October 2010 (UTC)