Talk:Tron (franchise)

Requested move
Alright! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.129.60.243 (talk) 05:27, 12 July 2013 (UTC) 
 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was Move Tron to Tron (disambiguation) & Tron (film) to Tron. Timrollpickering (talk) 23:21, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

– I think the franchise is the primary topic. Let's discuss this. D O N D E groovily  Talk to me  04:09, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Tron (franchise) → Tron
 * Tron → Tron (disambiguation)
 * Support; I think you're right. There are a lot of alternative uses, but they all seem pretty marginal in one way or another (either nicknames, or partial title matches, or minor uses).  Powers T 13:11, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose because the franchise article does not outpace the original film article in terms of traffic. A simple search engine test shows that "Tron" as a term is most associated with the original film, so I see a stronger case for that topic. I would also argue that the original film has educational value as a noteworthy science fiction film, where the franchise is merely a reflection of that film being milked by the studio. Just because the non-franchise articles are grouped under the franchise article on the disambiguation page does not mean that the franchise article is the one that readers are most likely to look for or the one that has the most educational value. I'd prefer maintaining the disambiguation page as-is or exploring the possibility of having the original film as the primary topic. Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 15:59, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd be fine with the film being primary as well. Powers T 20:47, 30 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Support move of Tron → Tron (disambiguation) and Tron (film) → Tron --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 06:11, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Make the film primary good idea folks, that makes more sense. D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  12:06, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

WRONG!
In the commentary for Tron, it was meant to mean elecTRON. (Dave33333, Tron fan, and CP wiki user) --72.106.216.112 (talk) 17:39, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Tron Lightcycles.jpg
File:Tron Lightcycles.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

-- Marchjuly (talk) 05:11, 20 August 2018 (UTC)