Talk:Trondheim Central Station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

GA On Hold
This article has been placed on hold, because a few minor changes are needed. Generally, all the information about the station is present, written well and well refereces. A copyedit was needed as the english was incorrect in places. I also re-ordered sections of the article as I felt it would flow better.

The section "Dovrebanen arrives" needs some expansion. The first sentence talks of a competition to re-deisgn the station. It does not state who won the competion, or why, or much about their winning design. I feel that this lack of information about the archetecture is quite a gap since that section of the article is about the redesign of the station.

This article will be watched for seven days, and if no siginificant improvement is made may be failed without notice. Please feel free to ask me questions here or on my talk page. Good luck! Million_Moments (talk)
 * Please leave me a note here when you feel you have completed the changes I have asked so that I can review the article again. Million_Moments (talk) 12:03, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the review and the copyedit. I believe I have addressed your comments—it was necessary to dig up some more sources so I apologies for the excessive time for the edits. I have not been able to establish who won the 1910 competition, but the implications of the design have been described in greater detail. If this is not sufficient for you, I am more than happy to look more, but a fear it would be fruitless without OR (digging up city archives). There is also a section on architecture in place. Again, thanks for the review, polish and comments. Arsenikk (talk)  20:59, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

GA Pass
I am very happy to pass this article to GA status. Before the hold process, the article was pretty close to being GA and the work done during the hold has improved it more than I expected! Well done. Normally I would not find an article about a railway station interesting but the clear and concise nature of thi article means it is worth while reading. Part of the GA process is to suggest future improvements, and obviously if you are able to find out who won the competition (I understand how difficult that might be) and any other encylopedic information it should be done. Some of the paragraphs are quite long with the refereces for the entire paragraph at it's end. Referecnes only actually need to be given after statements that may be contested and direct quotes, but where a paragraph maybe talking about two seperate things under the same reference it maybe advisible to use that reference internally. For example, the annoucement that there would be two stations, and the fact that this was protested about by the public and brought to court are related enough to be in the same paragraph, but they do not necessarily sound like they would have the same reference.

Congratulations, and keep up the good work! Million_Moments (talk) 13:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the review. Arsenikk (talk)  18:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC)