Talk:Tropaeolum/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

At Editor review/Cwmhiraeth, I listed some major problems with the history section of this article (which I have just removed). Considering that these edits were one of the reasons to accept this as a GA, even though the editor self-admitted that the edit was guesswork (and turns out to be wrong). Looking further at the article, I see things like "The hardiest species is T. polyphyllum from Chile, the perennial roots of which can survive underground when air temperatures drop as low as −15°C (5°F).", in the lead, which is not sourced and not repeated or explained in the body. I don't think this article warrants the GA rating. Fram (talk) 11:25, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Nothing having happened to this reassessment for the past six weeks, I have reincorporated the History section as modified by User:Plantsurfer below. I have dealt with the T. polyphyllum issue you mention above. Are there any other problems that you can identify? Apart from growing and liking nasturtiums, I can't now imagine why I should have bothered to bring this article to GA back in 2012. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:16, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

I have delisted it. The assessment that brought this to GA was clearly deficient, and the whole of the article needs serious scrutiny. The "species in cultivation" section starts with a rather definite claim, "The most common flower in cultivation is a hybrid of T. majus, T. minus and T. peltophorum,", linked to one ebsite of dubious reliability; this claim is not put a strongly in any reliable source I checked, most indicating that commong garden nasturtium is T. Majus, with some hybrid elements mentioned in some cases, like here (no indication of what the hybrid species are) or here (majus, sometimes a hybrid with peltophorum).

The article also doesn't even mention Monardes, which is a rather serious oversight. I suggest, if you want this article to again become a GA in the future, that you go over it from start to end, expand, rewrite, resource it, and then start the GA process again (I'll let someone else review it then). Until then, as it should never have been promoted in the first place, I think it is better if it delisted. Fram (talk) 07:20, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

History section
Might I suggest the following modification of the history section?

History
The first Tropaeolum species had evidently been introduced into Europe by the 16th century, since the English herbalist John Gerard reports having received seeds of the plant from Europe in his 1597 book Herball, or Generall Historie of Plantes. Tropaeolum majus was named by the Swedish botanist Carl Linnaeus, who chose the genus name because the plant reminded him of an ancient custom. After victory in battle, the Romans used to set up a trophy pole called a tropaeum (from the Greek tropaion, source of English "trophy"). On this the armour and weapons of the vanquished foe were hung. Linnaeus was reminded of this by the plant as the round leaves resembled shields and the flowers, blood-stained helmets.

Nasturtiums were once known commonly as "Indian cresses" because they were introduced from the Americas, known popularly then as the Indies, and used like cress as salad ingredients. John Gerard called the plant "Indian Cresses" in his herbal. He wrote: "unto the backe part (of the flower) doth hange a taile or spurre, such as hath the Larkes heele, called in Latine Consolida regalis. He was comparing the flowers of Indian cress to those of forking larkspur (Consolida regalis) of the buttercup family. ~