Talk:Tropical Depression One-E (2009)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 22:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I have no idea what this means—"According to officials in Mexico, the formation and impact of the depression near and in Sinaloa has never been recorded before."
 * Reworded Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * What happened to the depression after it degenerated? When did the remains move ashore? Did any moisture affect inland areas?
 * Added where it moved ashore, other than that, there is no information on where the remnants went. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Added where it moved ashore, other than that, there is no information on where the remnants went. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Nice work overall. I'm putting this on-hold for now to allow the above issues to be addressed. I look forward to being able to promote this. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 22:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Alt text would be nice, but not required for GA.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Fixed the two issues Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:15, 22 November 2009 (UTC)