Talk:Tropical Storm Amelia (1978)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk · contribs) 21:12, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi! I'll be taking this article for review, and should have a full set up comments up within a day. Dana boomer (talk) 21:12, 26 December 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

The article looks good to go at this point. I've made quite a few copyedits, though, so please check those and make sure you're happy! I'm going to wait to pass the article until I have your approval on the changes I've made, but at this point I think that's mainly a formality. Please let me know if you have any questions, Dana boomer (talk) 17:05, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I have no problem with the edits you've made. I'm not terribly good with copyedits, so I appreciate your changes. And I have no questions. Thanks for the review! Hurricane Angel Saki (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2011 (UTC)