Talk:Tropical Storm Bernard/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * "With less than optimal conditions for development, the JTWC assessed the chances of the low developing into a tropical cyclone within 24 hours as "poor"" - Remove this paragraph as it doesnt add anything to the article and is unoffical
 * It's useful to the article in determining the state of the low Cyclonebiskit 15:11, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I would like to see piped links in the references to Meteo France and the Joint Typhoon Warning Center
 * Done Cyclonebiskit 15:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Who are Meteo France? - you do not state within the article what they have to do with the SWIO
 * Done Cyclonebiskit 15:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Shouldnt you also include a link to sea surface temperatures?
 * Done Cyclonebiskit 15:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Their are a couple of statements that arent referenced.
 * Which ones? I don't see any that are unreferenced Cyclonebiskit 15:11, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Just a couple of things that should be easily fixed so im placing this GAN on hold Jason Rees (talk) 03:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Ok evreythings been sorted now so im passing this article Jason Rees (talk) 23:13, 13 February 2009 (UTC)