Talk:Tropical Storm Hermine (2004)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the review up within a few hours. Dana boomer (talk) 18:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * In most of the article, you call Gaston a hurricane, but in the Impact section you call it a tropical storm. Reason?
 * This is because in the impact section, the article refers to Gaston as a tropical storm. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  01:16, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * In the Impact section, you go once from inches to mm, and the second time from mm to in. Please make this consistent.
 * This was also intentional, as with the second instance, the article is giving information about rainfall in Canada, where metric is the standard. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  01:16, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The last two sentences of the "Impact" section needs a ref
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

There are just a couple of items that need addressing, so I am putting this article on hold to allow time for the editors to tweak the article. If you have questions, let me know here on the review page or on my talk page. Dana boomer (talk) 18:49, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Things look good, and I will accept your responses on the two above. I added a ref for the spot that I was concerned about - if you have a different/better ref that you would prefer to use, please feel free to toss mine. I am passing the article now. Dana boomer (talk) 13:10, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Whoops, I didn't even see that point about the reference. In any event, thanks for passing the article! –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  14:07, 21 August 2008 (UTC)