Talk:Tropical Storm Jerry (2007)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I will be reviewing this article for GA. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 21:24, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * This certainly is a minimalist article. I wonder if you could use the opportunity to explain words like "system" and "convention" to use this article to expand the reader's understanding of how weather works.
 * Explained "convection", which is what I assume you mean by "convention". :) I do, however, find it difficult to imagine how the word "system" would be hard to understand. "System", in the meteorological sense of the word, is more-or-less the same as in the everyday use of the word. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  21:12, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I thought you could flesh out the article with a little more explanation - just a little.
 * I wish I could, but as the storm never affected land and lasted for just two days, this is as large as the article is going to get. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  23:52, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Is the "core" the same thing as the "eye"?
 * Yep. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  23:52, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Article meets the basic GA criteria.
 * 1) It is clearly written with a good prose style.
 * 2) It is well referenced with reliable sources and appears to be factually accurate.
 * 3) It is written from a neutral point of view.
 * 4) It appears to cover the topic thoroughly and concisely.
 * 5) It is compliant with image policy.
 * 6) It is stable with no edit warring.

Passed. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 00:02, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I appreciate it. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:08, 23 August 2008 (UTC)