Talk:Tropical Storm Josephine (2002)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 13:53, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The lead should be simply a summary of the article, and should have no new information (and therefore no references) in the lead.
 * Either use convert templates for everything or nothing. The use of them is mixed with manual conversions throughout the article.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

There are just a couple of minor MOS issues that need to be addressed before this article is promoted to GA status, so I'm putting the article on hold to allow you time to deal with these. If you have any questions, drop me a note here on the review page or on my talk page. Dana boomer (talk) 14:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Just a note that I will be going out of town this weekend, and probably will not have access to the Internet from Friday night through Sunday afternoon/evening. I'll be back online Sunday night to check all of my articles and reviews, but I wanted you to know that I will not be responding to queries or comments for the next couple of days. Dana boomer (talk) 20:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, I've removed all the conversion templates and replaced them with text. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 22:35, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 13:11, 15 September 2008 (UTC)