Talk:Tropical Storm Kammuri (2002)

Todo
You need more than one source, and you need to do some more summarizing on your own. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 03:00, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Relies too much on JTWC, wording needs changing, stom stregnth in inofobx should follow basin standards, i.e., knots (km/h, mph). NSLE 03:06, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * (so I don't lose it). YE  Pacific   Hurricane  04:02, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Merge?
There's only two paragraphs of impact. The season article is rather short, as well. Should this one be merged? Hurricanehink ( talk ) 20:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll try and work on it soon. íslenskur fel lib ylur #12 (samtal) 20:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, it just needs a lot more info, which I'm not sure exists. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 20:54, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Already it's much better, and a merge is no longer needed. You're doing a good job so far, keep it up. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 22:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Cool. But I won't have much more time to work on it today. íslenskur fel lib ylur #12 (samtal) 22:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * OK. Some future todo would be getting direct sources for the Gary Padgett report. Be sure to check relief web and dartmouth flood observatory for some possible info. Of course, a Google search will probably yield a lot of info. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 22:12, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

GAR
Hi. I'm thinking about initiating a GAR on this article. There is no indication the references were checked for plagiarism, and the references were not verifiable. I am specifically talking about citations where there the format is "Title." Agency. Date. Accessdate is not a relevant field as there is no url to access. (There is no page number, no location, no author.) The sources are available outside Lexis Nexis, so that is no excuse to not link to them. As these articles appear to persistently be passed with out full citations, I am considering going back over older articles by the nominator and putting up all articles that lack full citations where the reviewer has not indicated a references check has been these references for plagiarism and factually accuracy. --LauraHale (talk) 19:26, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I left a message on your talk page. If you do indeed plan on doing such a review for other storms, may I suggest you contact the entire project, as we regularly do this, even on some featured articles (see Typhoon Chataan). --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 19:40, 18 October 2012 (UTC)