Talk:Tropical Storm Keith (1988)

GA review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

-Phoenix 17:18, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * 1) It is stable.
 * 2) It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * 1) Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail:

GA Sweeps Review: Pass
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 08:20, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Lead
The lead states that "Tropical Storm Keith was the latest North Atlantic hurricane..." Ummm, isn't the latest North Atlantic tropical storm, or something else? As it stands, this looks contradictory. I note that around the time of FA promotion, the article had the wording "the latest Atlantic tropical cyclone", but was changed here to fix links. What should the links and wording be? Chris857 (talk) 03:38, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Fixed. It should say TC. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 03:40, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Tropical Storm Keith (1988). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060622095441/http://www.floridadisaster.org:80/brm/Mit_Success/ms_cccl_buildings_survive_opal.htm to http://www.floridadisaster.org/BRM/Mit_Success/ms_cccl_buildings_survive_opal.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 21:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tropical Storm Keith (1988). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110609220635/http://www.dep.state.fl.us/beaches/publications/pdf/sw-gulf.pdf to http://www.dep.state.fl.us/beaches/publications/pdf/sw-gulf.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120207003355/http://web.naplesnews.com/hurricane/d184852a.htm to http://web.naplesnews.com/hurricane/d184852a.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:50, 23 September 2017 (UTC)