Talk:Tropical Storm Melissa (2007)

I gave it start-class, but I think with some work, it could possibly reach B. Juliancolton (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Hey Julian. I'm reviewing this article and have put it on hold.

Well written: Only problem is this typo:

''Operationally, the storm briefly attained winds of 45 mph (75 km/h) late on September 29 as some satellite estimates showed a slightly stronger storm with deeper convection,[7]but in the pos-season analysis.... ''

Factual accuracy: Only problem here is the references here are missing:

"The system lost its deep convection and by the afternoon of September 30, Melissa degenerated into a remnant low as thunderstorm activity diminished. After the circulation dissipated, the remnant low continued its general west-northwest track to the south of a rebuilding subtropical ridge in the central Atlantic."

Broadness : Pass

NPOV : Pass

Stability : Pass

Images : Pass

Those are the improvements necessary for GA.TheNobleSith (talk) 18:16, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your review. I believe that I have addressed your concerns. If not let me know. Thanks, Juliancolton  ( Happy St. Patrick's day! ) 18:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, you addressed the concerns. Thanks. It is now a GA. Honestly, though, does this article meet notability guidelines?TheNobleSith (talk) 18:26, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! While it might not seem like the most notable storm, it meets the notability guidelines, at least for the WPTC. Juliancolton  ( Happy St. Patrick's day! ) 18:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Alright, just wondering. TheNobleSith (talk) 18:33, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Merge?
Just continuing the discussions, I think this should be merged. It's a glorified met. history article. --Hurricanehink ( talk ) 04:48, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 00:14, 5 December 2010 (UTC)