Talk:Tropical Storm Norman (2006)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

The main body of the article is great but there are a few things in the lead which can be added and an image (if possible) would be good too.

"The twelfth named storm of the 2006 Pacific hurricane season, Norman developed on October 9 from a tropical wave. " It seems like you didn't finish the sentence, saying where the storm was located would fix that up.

Once that is done, the article should pass GA Review. Great job on the article. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 00:08, 2 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review. I got those two things. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 03:12, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

GA review Pass
Great, this little guy is going up for this article. There's probably not much left for you to do with this article but if there is, it's going to help towards a FA. Keep up the good work. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 03:37, 2 September 2008 (UTC)