Talk:Tropical Storm Octave (1983)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 21:52, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Guess I will be doing my first GA review. There shouldn't be much to fix, since most are fixed from the first GA review. Expect the review to start soon.&mdash; CycloneIsaac – E-Mail 21:52, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Pretty good already.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * What needs to be fixed has been fixed. But "t" in "tropical cyclones portal" needs to be capitalized.&mdash; CycloneIsaac – E-Mail 22:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All of them are reliable.&mdash; CycloneIsaac – E-Mail 22:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * I'm sure you can add some pictures of damage in Arizona.&mdash; CycloneIsaac – E-Mail 22:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Nice job. Good luck with the 1983 PHS GT.&mdash; CycloneIsaac – E-Mail 22:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Nice job. Good luck with the 1983 PHS GT.&mdash; CycloneIsaac – E-Mail 22:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)