Talk:Tropical Storm Olivia (2006)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I am going to be reviewing this article which is currently up for Good Article Nomination. I should have the full review out within an hour or so. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 03:57, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * "Due to the lack of any impact, the name Olivia was not retired, and is scheduled to be reused during the named storm of the 2012 Pacific hurricane season." Awkward sentence, please reword
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Almost made it, just one little blip with the last section so the nomination is on hold. After that is fixed, the article will be promoted to GA. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 04:02, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Got it, thanks. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  04:05, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good now. I'm passing the article, good job :D Cyclonebiskit (talk) 04:10, 27 November 2008 (UTC)