Talk:Tropical Storm Tammy (2005)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I will be reviewing this article currently up for Good article nomination. The full review will be up within an hour or two. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:35, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) Well Written
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * "Tropical Storm Tammy was a moderate strength but short lived tropical storm during..." –The wording could be a little better, but otherwise no other things I can see.
 * 1) Factually Accurate
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) '''Neutral point of view.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Stability
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Besides the first sentence, everything looks good. Just leave a comment here when the sentence has been fixed :-) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 16:55, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Great! I'm passing this article now, good job on it. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 17:26, 5 October 2008 (UTC)