Talk:Tropical Storm Vicente (2018)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: JavaHurricane (talk · contribs) 15:57, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Will do. -- Java Hurricane  15:57, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm currently a bit busy. I've read through the article, and have found a few errors; otherwise, the article is pretty much a GA already. Will post my concerns shortly. Excellent work Noah!  Java Hurricane  07:05, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Status
Good Article

Criteria
































Comments
Here we go...
 * Link to TCR in opening paragraph about "unusually small".
 * I did say that the storm was small in the met so it isnt necessary to cite in the lead. Noah Talk 16:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , Okay  Java Hurricane  16:38, 6 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Link to Hidalgos in second paragraph of lead links to "Hidalgo", not the Mexican state.
 * Fixed. Noah Talk 16:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)


 * "The storm left a total of 16 people dead throughout 2 states; 13 died in Oaxaca and 3 in Veracruz." I think you should replace the semicolon with a colon and remove the "died".
 * Did this. Noah Talk 16:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)


 * "The National Hurricane Center (NHC) first mentioned the system had the potential for tropical development early on October 19." Rephrase as "The NHC first began to monitor the system for potential..."
 * As mentioned by others in the past, that would be construed as OR because the NHC did begin monitoring it much earlier. Noah Talk 16:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , ah, I forgot that.  Java Hurricane  16:38, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

And that's it. An excellently written article, and I think we can look forward to a FAC in the near future. Good job ! Keeping until the issues are resolved. -- Java Hurricane  16:28, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Should be it. Noah Talk 16:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , I think we are done here. now, passed. Congratulations!  Java  Hurricane  16:39, 6 April 2020 (UTC)