Talk:Trouble (Coldplay song)

"musicscape"
Apparently the song's 'musicscape' is minimalist. This does not appear to be a real word. What does it mean? I vote it should be changed to something more accessible to laymen. 86.141.82.75 (talk) 22:11, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Untitled
WHAT THE HELL is all that babble about a band called Trouble? What's that got to do with Coldplay? I'm removing it and see if anyone gets upset. DarkBard 08:07, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Oh, apparently that band really did exist. DarkBard 08:10, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Unsourced
"Trouble" is a piano-based ballad that underwent many stages of development. In September 1999, the song was dominated by fast guitar riffs and aggressive vocals reminiscent of Supergrass. At the final recording sessions for Parachutes, the song was slowed down to its current form with the new guitar and percussion pieces.

--Efe (talk) 11:40, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Track times and names
Since IHelpWhenICan has been reverting my corrections of the track times and names, here's some screenshots and websites for reference. The screenshots are for the times and are from various media players with this CD (sorry about the quality) inserted in my laptop.

Times:
 * 1) CD in Winamp
 * 2) CD in Foobar2000
 * 3) CD in Windows Media Player
 * 4) CD in Exact Audio Copy
 * 5) AMG

Names:
 * 1) Discogs 1
 * 2) Discogs 2
 * 3) Discogs 3

-- I need a name (talk) 14:25, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * With no disrespect, none of those fit the definition of reliable sources. I have added sources on my own. Read that link to get more information. Basically, here-say or what you found out on your own doesn't count. Reliable sources also exclude other user input sites like Wikipedia (this also means you can't cite Wikipedia articles on other articles). Discogs is a user input site. Therefore, it may not be used, anywhere on Wikipedia.  I Help, When I Can. [12] 14:32, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The CD of the single in question itself is infinitely more reliable than the previous source used in the article, which was none whatsoever. This is seemingly the exact same methodology used by AMG, since any track times I've gotten off CDs have been consistent with the ones there, even when the Wikipedia ones differed. I specifically didn't use Discogs as a source for the times because of its user-edited nature (even though their guidelines also use the same methodology for CD times). I linked to images of the singles to show that those are the names of the tracks. If those are unreliable, then you might as well remove the cover image from this article, since that's also an image of the single. Hell, the source for it being called Trouble is also the single itself, maybe that's suspect as well? -- I need a name (talk) 14:57, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok... You did not understand me...
 * "The CD of the single in question itself is infinitely more reliable than the previous source used in the article, which was none whatsoever." → True, but you just can't add material to an article without giving a reliable source. You are hurting the article further by doing that.
 * "This is seemingly the exact same methodology used by AMG, since any track times I've gotten off CDs have been consistent with the ones there, even when the Wikipedia ones differed." → Allmusic is a source filled with release notes. They do not use that method. Count this as a coincidence.
 * "... (even though their guidelines also use the same methodology for CD times)." → Ok, but we already established that it is a unreliable source, so does this matter?
 * "I linked to images of the singles to show that those are the names of the tracks." → You did not link to images of the single. You linked to images of the single in your CD player, which doesn't hold any weight in Wikipedia.
 * "If those are unreliable, then you might as well remove the cover image from this article, since that's also an image of the single." → That is the cover image of the single. It has a source on it's file page.
 * "Hell, the source for it being called Trouble is also the single itself, maybe that's suspect as well?" → No. The source is Allmusic. The title of the page is "Trouble".  I Help, When I Can. [12] 15:19, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see, you didn't actually read my first comment at all. You should've saved me the time and the effort and just told me that to begin with, then I could've just ignored you completely. -- I need a name (talk) 17:42, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Go ahead, ignore me, just know that the majority of Wikipedia shares my views, and we will be there to revert the incorrect edits you do. Cheers.  I Help, When I Can. [12] 18:29, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Trouble (Coldplay song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050811021036/http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/oct00/articles/ken.htm to http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/oct00/articles/ken.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060527112128/http://music.yahoo.com/read/news/12043300 to http://music.yahoo.com/read/news/12043300

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:25, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

trouble
coldplay parachutes 188.151.122.253 (talk) 11:01, 2 November 2022 (UTC)