Talk:Truls Klausen

Could I ask for a reconsideration?
This draft was created by, who was blocked indefinitely in July 2021 and has not requested unblock. On 30 November 2021 I reworked it entirely; the draft we now have is sourced, and I believe demonstrates notability. (It was mentioned at the AN/I discussion that some of Liverpoolpics' translated submissions at AfC were on notable topics.) I pinged the declining reviewers in my edit summary, but since the draft is now approaching its 6-month editing anniversary again, I would like to request a re-examination. I think it would be wrong for me to flip the template back to "submit", since if accepted, it would then be credited to me as article creator. If none of you is inclined to consider it again, could you please switch the template status for me so I don't get the credit? Either way, many thanks. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:52, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * , if you resubmit the AfC draft, shouldn't you be notified of its decline/acceptance? Manually, an AfC-submission tag could be incorporated at the top of the draft, alongside username of a specific user who should get notified about the AfC decline/accept (normally the one who submits the draft). There's no benefit in substituting the name of the old blocked user in it . If you've made the improvements and if you believe it is okay now and might be accepted, just put on the tag and resubmit. ─ The Aafī on Mobile   (talk)|undefined  20:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I really don't want to get one of those "Your article has been accepted" templates on my user talk, and as I understand it they're autogenerated if I put on the article or press the "resubmit" button, since they constitute edits by me. If it weren't for the pandemic, I'd go to the public library and use the public-access terminals, but I think they've taken that away. It would presumably be a big violation of some sort for me to unofficially take responsibility by moving the draft to mainspace myself, since I am not an AfC reviewer (nor do I wish to be one; using the tool would be technically beyond me, apart from the fact that I lean inclusionist). But as I understand it, AfC reviewers and admins can circumvent the button and flip a draft back to requesting review without its being assigned to them for the user talk template if it's created? If your concern is that I won't get credit for my work, let me state unequivocally that rescuing the article is enough for me. I might or might not put it on my user page list (which is primarily a reminder for me to check back whether anything needs updating or has been vandalised). I actually would prefer Liverpoolpics to get a notice on their talk page; many of the topics they wrote drafts on were indeed notable, they deserve that much credit whatever the story behind that account was, and I prefer for anyone who happens to look at their talk page to see evidence of that, if only because we don't know what the story was. But you're the AfC reviewer, not me :-) Yngvadottir (talk) 21:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * , thanks for the explanation, just resubmit the draft and I'll make a note that you're not notified if it is accepted or declined. ─ The Aafī on Mobile   (talk)|undefined  06:44, 24 May 2022 (UTC)