Talk:Trupti Desai

Trupti desai rss relation
Somebody added that trupti desai has been protected by rss..its such a false accuse and i know her personally and she was never an rss biased lady. So kindly edit that portion or else we will forced to take legal steps against the page owner(s). Hello1manu (talk) 10:51, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

She is a active member of rss AND SECOND WIFE OF MANOJ PADINJATTECHERI because she is protected by rss
She is true communist Gokul gopo (talk) 11:12, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Who said she is rss??? Who said she is communist??? Give the reference... Sarathpkanichodu (talk) 07:21, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protection
This article has undergone so much vandalism in the last 24 hours. I think that this article should be semi-protected. -- Netha  (talk)  13:29, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Rumours
I've noticed that you removed the mention of rumors from the page Trupti Desai, is there any reason they can't be there? The sentence ends with "but this has not been proven" because they rumors are unproven rumors and accusations, and therefore will not have reliable sources. When I said you used the same source, I mean for the first sentence, which it looked like you removed from the diff (sorry about that). I think it's important to address that the rumours exist and that they are indeed just rumours. Do you mean there should a reliable source proving that the rumours exist? – Brandon XLF  (talk) 03:30, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi! The text i removed was thus:

"Some people, mostly right-wing people, notably Rishi Bagree, have claimed that Desai has converted to Christianity, but this has not been proven. Rishi Bagree has been found to be a spreader of fake news."


 * Of the references used, twitter is self-published and boomlive.in and newscentral24x7.com are not WP:RS. I cant find them being used on Wikipedia much (boomlive has been used 7-8 places, but one would have to check whether they really meet WP:RS. Altnews.in is fine to use. But the article used does not even mention Desai. It was used to establish that Bagree spreads fake news and thus make readers conclude/infer/WP:SYNTHESIS that everything he says is fake. I am open to mentioning a line or so about the rumors; but we need RS for that. If none of the RS has ever given weightage to these rumors by not writing a single article about them; Wikipedia cant give weightage to it either. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 13:48, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

, I do realize that the line is not very well written, specifically the synthesis material. I do believe that boomlive is a reliable source for reasons such as the fact that Facebook has partnered with them to sport fake news, the site has been verified by Poynter Institute to be in compliance with IFCN principles because it exhibits "a commitment to nonpartisanship and fairness". The site has also been reported on by the Hindustan Times. Based on this, I think they should be considered a reliable source. I think the sentence should be rewritten as below, let me know what you think about it. Some people, mostly right-wing, have claimed that Desai has converted to Christianity, but this has been disproven. – Brandon XLF  (talk) 02:08, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I will need more time to look into Poynter. Btw, Poynter lists only 67 webistes. Does that mean only these 67 comply with IFCN? & what is IFCN please? And this does not include any major news outlets? I think Poynter is reviewing only the websites that apply to them for being reviewed. So their certificate is not really much worth as against to some website who is being called a RS based on their track record. Anyways; i agree with the sentence framing; with minor change maybe.... "Some right-wing people have claimed that Desai converted to Christianity; but this claims have not been proven." §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 13:14, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , the above link for Poynter should be Poynter Institute. You can also sort of read what IFCN is at IFCN (although it's just a redirect to a small section). The problem to your change to the sentence is that the boomlive article also mentions that it's not only right-wing people. So maybe something like "Some people, most of whom are right-wing, have claimed that Desai converted to Christianity; but this has not been proven." The thing with IFCN is that it only lists fact-checking news sites, and there are not very many (if any) major news outlets that are solely devoted to fact-checking. Poynter also owns Tampa Bay Times, which is a reliable newspaper. – Brandon XLF  (talk) 20:40, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay! I have added the sentence in the article now. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:31, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:07, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Trupti Desai.jpg