Talk:Trust busting

CRAP
This article is crap. It contains absolutely ZERO sources or citations to verify its claims. ("trusts had monopolies on everything!!!") I'm going to nominate for deletion unless someone can find some support.71.111.195.197 (talk) 17:43, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Merge
The Sherman Act followed Ohio's Valentine Anti-Trust Act (1898). The senator was managing a thesis, having calling in to form The Sherman Act, because Sherman's move to Anti-Trust Act was going before Supreme Court. I rarely speak of sugar and water, 1840s first sugar granulated in East Boston, MA, USA. Still sure fire words to start harm at citizen(s). I know surname Sherman, until my USA youth crib turns around. "Melissa Chosen Satan, since 1993", gave USA citizens erotica and mosquitos to keep going, as requested by Atomic surnames and Faiths of USA and, government system perfection, government system perfection parallel citizens, bureaucracy net, and, structure stablizied by citizens. I am more quite than any person I know. I am moreso quite, non-acute/non-Akathisia. Annie -User:captainfudd —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.237.80.247 (talk) 19:23, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

I think that Trust Buster should be merged into this article. There's some overlap and I'm not sure if the Trust Buster article can be expanded to cover much that can't be put here. -JSmith60 02:09, 24 January 2007 (UTC).

i think so


 * Okay, I'm going ahead and merging the two articles. -JSmith60 22:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I Think That They Should Give More info —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.184.242.175 (talk) 20:12, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment about 21st Century
I think the portion of the article about 21st Century Trust-busting does not meet Wikipedia's Quality Standards. There is almost no detail about who the trusts are and who is calling for them to be broken up. It sounds more like opinion than information.
 * It sounds like the back story behind a video game called Trust Busters. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.232.27 (talk) 00:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

As is it's unsubstantiated and unsourced opinion that does nothing to inform readers. Unless someone wants to write a section on modern anti-trust efforts, the section should be deleted and replaced with Internal Links to more in-depth articles on Wikipedia about modern anti-trust laws, enforcement bodies, and cases, leaving the Trust-busting article, for the time being as least, as a history of anti-trust at the turn of the 20th Century. 58.173.51.73 (talk) 18:45, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Roosevelt compared to Taft
I think the line "However, William Howard Taft passed twice as much trust-busting legislation during his presidency." is somewhat misleading as Roosevelt's Trust-Busting legacy came from lawsuits filed by him against trusts rather than legislation passed. --AngryBacon (talk) 12:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)