Talk:Tsai Jui-yueh

repeated unexplained contet removal
Please do not remove content that is backed by reliable sources from this article without explanation. In my repeated reverts to edits by I have repeatedly appealed to Tsai's legacy and influence in every edit summary. Though the source I cited does not use the specific language "legacy and influence", Tsai's connections to the other people mentioned in the article about her is an attempt to establish significance per WP:A7. Further coverage expands on why she is notable, but all such sourced claims help keep this article from being deleted. Please contribute information about Tsai that leads to expansion of the article (and the reduction of systemic bias on Wikipedia). This cannot happen if material attesting to notability are continually removed or lie unexplained.

For the rationale behind this revert, see WP:LEDE, specifically, "...significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article." Also see Good article criteria #2, which explains things more succinctly than I can. Vycl1994 (talk) 04:59, 29 August 2017 (UTC)