Talk:Tsim Tung Brother Cream

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Tsim Tung Brother Cream actually got extensive media coverage in numerous Chinese newspapers as well as TV apperance in Hong Kong (please see zh wiki for reference).--SiuMai (talk) 08:40, 10 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I would imagine having mentioned in newspaper articles is enough evidence to justify notability requirement. Please correct me if I am wrong.--SiuMai (talk) 11:00, 10 April 2013 (UTC)


 * You are wrong. It needs multiple or non-trivial mentions specifically about the subject in reliable sources; which is much much more than a mention in a (couple of) news. That would be enough only to avoid speedy deletion. - Nabla (talk) 19:09, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Tsim Tung brother cream was so popular in Hong Kong these days that it does not make sense to delete him from Wikipedia on the ground of fair treatment. If not-so-famous TV actors (such as Raymond Lam Fung) is qualified for having an individual page on Wikipedia, then no way can brother cream be deleted because he is much much more popular in Hong Kong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.200.176.30 (talk) 14:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)