Talk:Tsyklon-4

The name of this page and references need to be changed to Cyclone-4. It's the correct name of the vehicle and program. It's unclear why anyone would want to call it anything else other than to add confusion to the proper name. My "source" for this information is that I work for Yuzhnoye, on this program. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John Isella (talk • contribs) 16:16, 9 August 2016 (UTC) John Isella (talk) 16:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Interesting. Can you point us to any recent sources or published documents that would show the state of the rocket development and deployment calendar? Lack of information over the last few years may lead readers to assume that the program was abandoned. Regarding the name, you would need to get editor consensus to move it to Cyclone-4, by filing a move request. — JFG talk 14:57, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * , I went ahead and added the English name to the "also known as" list, but I continue to believe that this is just the English marketing name, and not the native Yuzhnoye name, for obvious reasons. Also note that Cyclone-4 is set to redirect to the article, so it's not like someone searching for that would be led astray. — Huntster (t @ c) 17:12, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Agreed, thanks. I'd love to hear news of the project from, though. — JFG talk 18:19, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tsyklon-4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100205080645/http://www.arkos.kharkov.ua/sumbr_e.php to http://arkos.kharkov.ua/sumbr_e.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Hatnotes
If the Cyclone IV FPGA ever gets it's own article, or even a offhand mention in Altera or Intel, there should probably be an  207.107.65.131 (talk) 13:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)