Talk:Tubal

..and what is the problem identifying all the Iberians as related tribes? afterall two of these groups have reached us today Georgians and Basques do have vast number of ethno-cultural parallels. to say nothing about the linguistic 'anomaly' of Georgian and Basque languages.

Untitled
z. sorryz what 'luwian' has to do with tubal? isn't it on the wrong page?. may be move it to Tabal page. actually you have it on both pages and then have 'not to be confused' sign...hmm actually it would be wrong on either one. we need more references proving the linguistic connection of Tubal/Tabal tribes speaking Indo-European Lawinian language. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.212.108.243 (talk) 02:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Page in need of overhaul
This page is in need of an overhaul for several reasons. I'll do part of the necessary work, but I'm leaving this note for anyone else who might want to pitch in. There's a number of issues snarled together. First, there's the problem of missing citations. That can be chipped away at, reference by reference. A problem that will require larger edits is organization. As it stands now, the article makes no attempt to differentiate (1) views about Tubal held by scholarly, reliable sources, from (2) speculation about Tubal recorded by tons of medieval people with no particular expertise in Ancient Near Eastern scholarship. Right now, the text is divided into two big sections based on the date that various opinions on Tubal were expressed. However, the first section "early theories" contains some opinions from as late as the twentieth century, while the second section "later historical identifications" contains some opinions from as early as the first century. The two sections, because they are divided solely on the basis of chronology, should have parallel names. While "early theories" is a decent name, "later historical identifications" could mislead an unwary thinker into thinking that he has now come to the part of the article that contains scholarly opinions. He would be wrong to think this.Alephb (talk) 21:49, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tubal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726010152/http://www.jon-ruthven.org/rosh.pdf to http://www.jon-ruthven.org/rosh.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:42, 11 December 2017 (UTC)