Talk:Tucker-class destroyer/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the good article criteria. I have to say that I think this article is genuinely excellent and would support it at FAC as is if it came up there.--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * My only (minor) suggestion, is to give the number of sailors killed on Jacob Jones in that ship's synopsis.--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Good point. I added it there (and in the lead of USS Jacob Jones (DD-61), upon which this summary was based). — Bellhalla (talk) 19:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)


 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * It is stable.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail:

Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review. One of my fastest GAs, ever! — Bellhalla (talk) 19:50, 8 May 2009 (UTC)