Talk:Tudor Watches

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Datawords 17 (talk) 14:26, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

We only mentionned factual and historical content.

We didn't mentionned any price or marketing content that should be contrary to wikipedia's rules : Invoking section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion is therefore unjustified. If author Shirt58 can justify through examples, we are of course willing to make all necessary changes.

We already published the Rolex Wikipedia page and followed the same structure, with the same care of rules.

Article reviewer Shirt58 requested a speedy deletion, only 2 minutes after starting reviewing it, without notyfying article author of what's wrong or what part could cause problems.

We are always of good will to make any changes in our articles in order to repect wikiepdians rules : In this perpective, we expect to have a dialogue approach at first before taking harsh decisions by simply deleting articles without reading them.

We hope to have some more constructive exchanges in the near future,

Wishing you an excellent continuation,

Kind Regards,

in cuffs.13 mins
release.mask on head. electric blanket. 148.66.176.28 (talk) 01:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)