Talk:Tuesday's Child (Holby City)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: -- RAIN the ONE  (Talk) 19:55, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Checklinks okay. Dablinks okay. Refs all formatted correctly with work and publisher fields correct and correct formatting of dates. No edit warring, stable as nominator is the only contributor to the article. Spell checker reveals no errors. The lead is well written and covers the basics of the article clearly. Plot section is kept brief and straight to the point without dangering into reciting every scene. The prose is good. Production section is well written, sourced (checked quite a few of these to make sure everything is said), image of Adrian Edmondson has correct tags and verified for use and the caption is fine.. Quotes used often but broken down for easy reading. The same can be said for the reception section, not bias either, everything is right per WP:MOSTITLE in the prose. You've stuck to the subject in hand, nothing of non importance in there. One example of this would be in production discussing Quarshie's own background and thoughts on plot, but making sure you link it back to the character and prodcution. In some ways the article seems short, but I know that is due to the lack of sources for this type of subject, even more so with the episode in question being from a few years back.. so that's fine. Covered all available areas, those that are really needed IMO for a good article on a TV episode. So therefore with everything I've said and after reading over and over for the last hour, I think it's complete enough for a pass as their were no issues standing. Congrats. Reviewer:  RAIN the ONE  (Talk) 19:55, 12 August 2010 (UTC)