Talk:Tunguska (The X-Files)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 17:15, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Again, "The episode is one of those which helped to explore the series' overarching mythology." I feel this is kind of a clunky why to write this, maybe say "The episode helps to explore and expand the series' overarching mythology."
 * Fixed. GRAPPLE   X  03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * LEAD, no summary or mention of production
 * Fixed. GRAPPLE   X  03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Just before the lead plot summary, maybe add, "In this episode..." I think it helps to separate fact from fiction
 * Fixed. GRAPPLE   X  03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * "FBI special agentFox Mulder" space between 'agent' and 'Fox'
 * Appears to have been fixed. GRAPPLE   X  03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * "His parter Dana Scully (Gillian Anderson)m" remove 'm' after 'Anderson)'
 * Fixed. GRAPPLE   X  03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Infobox, maybe cite where you found all the guests stars at the very bottom, maybe after "Tegan Moss as Young Dana Scully" Is there a way to put a cite after the words "Guest stars"?
 * Fixed. GRAPPLE   X  03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Probably no need to wikilink and parenthesis who played who in the plot section if they are in the lead
 * "...infecting him with the oily black worms" I would just write "infecting with the black oil." But to each his own
 * Fixed. GRAPPLE   X  03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * "They decided to create a story which had connections to the Russian gulags, which led" two 'which's right after each other
 * Fixed. GRAPPLE   X  03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * "and it was felt that this two-part story was a good place to expand upon this as it allowed the production crew to "stretch the limits" of their resources and imagination." rewrite into "and it was felt that this two-part story was a good place to expand upon this, allowing the production crew to "stretch the limits" of their resources and imagination."
 * Fixed. GRAPPLE   X  03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * According to my copy of I Want to Believe, the episode was viewed by 18.85 million viewers and not households.
 * I see you got that one already. GRAPPLE   X  03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All good
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Thorough coverage, no sign of trivia
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Neural POV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * No edit warring
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * One picture, properly tagged. Are there any other free pictures to spice up the production section, it's kind of boring right now?
 * Stuck one in of the Allan Hills rock that inspired the episode. GRAPPLE   X  03:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed.--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:56, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Awesome! Looks good, I pass.--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed.--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:56, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Awesome! Looks good, I pass.--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Awesome! Looks good, I pass.--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)