Talk:Tunisian independence

fake article
what's that ? a war without battle ? Cliché Online (talk) 00:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Does anyone think that a war without battles should be named "war" ? Where are the sources for such an exaggerated name ? Does anyone refuse to see this article renamed into the more neutral "Tunisian Independence" ?UltimaRatio (talk) 15:09, 2 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, I do. There are many "wars" without major battles, including the Algerian War and the Algerian Civil War. This was a war of national liberation, such wars are typically fought trough terrorism.
 * Besides, your argument is meaningless in Wikipedia to begin with, as it is original research. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 16:19, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The WP:OR, here, seems to be the title "Tunisian War of Independence" : Which neutral and reliable sources are using this exaggerated name for a fast gradual independence processus with few bomb attacks ? I didn't understand what was your argument for refusing a more neutral and conventionnal name such as the "Tunisian Independence" ? By the way, 50% of this poorly sourced article is besides the point (Berber dynasties ??? Convention of la Marsa ??? Vichy control ???) and should be removed. UltimaRatio (talk) 19:13, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * There is a war without battle: Three Hundred and Thirty Five Years' War. Qajar (talk) 05:07, 21 August 2010 (UTC)