Talk:Tupelo Honey/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Adabow   ( complain )   10:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * The infobox has recording details, yet these are long-winded and somewhat confusing. Please rewrite these clearly and concisely.
 * I've changed the recording dates to the style that's in Achtung Baby, an FA.  Kitchen Roll   (Exchange words)  11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Do not mention the B-sides of the singles in the infobox
 * Removed  Kitchen Roll   (Exchange words)  11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I have made some minor copy-editing changes in the 'Background' and 'Recording' sections to help the flow of prose
 * 'Release' section: there is a lot of missing information here, such as record label, release dates and formats.
 * Added record label and release date. Isn't it obvious that it was an LP?  Kitchen Roll   (Exchange words)  11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Mention it anyway, as cassette tapes came out around then  Adabow   ( complain )   21:23, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * "Tupelo Honey reached number 27 on the Billboard charts", do you specifically mean the Billboard 200?
 * Changed  Kitchen Roll   (Exchange words)  11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * First paragraph of 'Aftermath' section seems a bit PoV, and may need rewording, using quotations, or additional references. Also second sentence should be reworded so that it doesn't start with 'but'.
 * Agadant will have to look at that - I don't own the Hage book.  Kitchen Roll   (Exchange words)  11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Agadant seems not to be editing at the moment, so I've hiden the paragraph from view, so it can be fixed at a later date - I'll leave a message on Agadant's talk page.  Kitchen Roll   (Exchange words)  14:50, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I have replaced the level three headers in the 'Track listing' section with bold lines
 * 'Personnel' section needs a source
 * Added source for "Production". The musicians are referencd in the "Recording section".  Kitchen Roll   (Exchange words)  11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * In the 'Charts' section there are not several charts, so reorganise this information as prose, rather than tables.
 * See The Freewheelin' Bob Dylan, an FA, which uses the same format.  Kitchen Roll   (Exchange words)
 * ""(Straight to Your Heart) Like a Cannonball" was the third single from the album and only reached number 119 on the American charts." Again, specify which chart
 * This would be the Billboard Hot 100, but this makes no sense as it charted at #119, which is more than 100, so I'm not sure about this.  Kitchen Roll   (Exchange words)  11:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I thought it might be the Top Heatseekers chart, but that was only introduced in 1993 (apparently)  Adabow   ( complain )   21:23, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I reworded it so it says it charted outside the Hot 100 at number 119, which makes more sense.  Kitchen Roll   (Exchange words)  14:50, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

There are some minor issues that need to be addressed. I will out the review on hold, and allow seven days for relevant changes to be made. Good luck improving the article!  Adabow   ( complain )   10:12, 15 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I guess everything is satisfied now - just make sure that the now-hidden paragraph is followed up on.  Adabow   ( complain )   06:57, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I've restated it using a direct quotation. Agadant (talk) 14:30, 21 July 2010 (UTC)