Talk:Tupocracy

Assistance
Hi, Thank you for working on the contents of the draft but noticed you decline the draft. Can you kindly give reasons for it, so I can look for the proper sources on how to develop it.Calyx2s (talk) 08:17, 4 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Calyx2s Hi there, the reason it was declined was stated on your talk page and at the top of the draft. This draft reads more like an original research, cite the sources that back up statements in the draft. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC)


 * please For clearity, are you saying I should find more sources to back some of the statement on the draft? If yes can you assist to highlight the areas of the contents not properly backed so I can easily identify the areas to find sources to fill..please.Calyx2s (talk) 08:28, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, any statement (or better, after every period.) that does not have a citation needs to be worked on. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:36, 4 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank for your insightful assistance. But if you can help with in-line citations needed on grey areas it will be well appreciated, so it will be easy for me to find the needed sources and if non exist (on sources to cover those inline citations) I will have to re-work it as you adviced.Please. Calyx2s (talk) 10:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Calyx2s While I am busy with some other things, I will give you a few tips on what you need to do.
 * He cited examples of tupocratic leaders such as Jesus Christ, Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King Jr., Udom Emmanuel, and others. This statement and the cited sources do not tally. None of them mentioned Nelson, Jesus, or others.
 * This is common throughout the article, so please cross-check and also in the lead section cite sources as there are still statements without a source, otherwise, you have to remove them entirely. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:16, 4 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I appreciate you for the insight and assistance, I have actually made the adjustments and corrections as adviced. Hope is better now?Calyx2s (talk) 15:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)


 * My friend, noticed you still decline. I made corrections to what you highlighted. I tried not to touch most of the contents because you re-wrote it but instead I looked for more sources and added more reasonable contents to it.please on specific can you kindly let's me know what to do, I'm almost giving up on this please.Calyx2s (talk) 15:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Calyx2s Hi there, I don't have much to say, please read this WP:NEO and you'll see reasons why you should no longer bother about that draft for now. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * , I just did but on specific said if it has at least 2-3 independent and reliable sources it can be accepted. But it has that.i'm confused.Calyx2s (talk) 15:40, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Calyx2s I will accept the draft now and allow the community decide. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:43, 8 November 2023 (UTC)