Talk:Tupolev Tu-12/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Crowz  RSA  01:51, 1 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Not so much.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Before I pass the article, I was wondering if there is any missing information, because there is only one article with prose. Crowz  RSA  02:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't understand. What do you mean only one article with prose?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:26, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I meant section. I mean, most articles have at least two. Crowz  RSA  21:02, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I added a subsection.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:53, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
 * It does look a little better, but should the section be renamed History, and the section below it be made into a subsection named Development. Like this:
 * History
 * Development
 * Testing and evaluation


 * Crowz RSA  01:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Seems rather elaborate for a five-paragraph article. And the testing is usually part of the development process.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:50, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay. Crowz  RSA  18:41, 20 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Result
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Crowz RSA  18:41, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Crowz RSA  18:41, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Crowz RSA  18:41, 20 March 2011 (UTC)