Talk:Tupolev Tu-85/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk) 01:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * prose:  (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * 2) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments
1. Link for DoD. 2. Link for Shvetsov design 3. Do the aspect ratio numbers need any conversion templates? 4. Change ventral to central 5. Suggest a link for dorsal 6. 85/2 was incorporated the lessons learned from the first aircraft. Suggest - 85/2 incorporated the lessons learned from the first aircraft,
 * Done.
 * Done.
 * No, they're ratios.
 * No, ventral means belly-mounted, but I've linked it.
 * Done.
 * Good catch. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:41, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 01:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Passed. Thurgate (talk) 00:34, 22 February 2011 (UTC)