Talk:Tuqaq/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''


 * As a discussion at the talk-page (transcluded below) attests to, most of the content is either not verifiable or misrepresentation of source. This violates criteria 2. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:22, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I had provided a chance to the nominator to correct course but things have not improved. TrangaBellam (talk) 15:24, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I had added additional sources on 25 October 2021 and there is not misrepresentation. The concepts were thoroughly reformulated, avoiding close paraphrasing, structure, and presentation according to WP:Copy. Wikipedia guidelines also state that phrasing of the information should be contributor's own original creation.-- Visioncurve Timendi causa est nescire  10:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC) Visioncurve is the orig. nominator.
 * there is not misrepresentation - There is a t/p discussion, where you can argue. TrangaBellam (talk) 10:34, 26 October 2021 (UTC)