Talk:Turf War (The Office)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 01:21, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I will begin reviewing this article as soon as I get a chance!--Dom497 (talk) 01:21, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * Quality of the article is good.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * Everything looks good for this section of the review.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * Everything looks good here.
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * All statements have reliable sources.
 * C. No original research:
 * No original research found within the article.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * All major aspects of the topic have been covered.
 * B. Focused:
 * Information remains focused to the article topic.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No bias found.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * There are no edit wars but the info within the article is changing on a daily basis. I will wait for a few days to see what happens, then come to a conclusion for this section. Article is stable enough.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Image licenses look good.
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Picture is appropriate and has a good caption.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * PASS!!!--Dom497 (talk) 00:17, 17 May 2012 (UTC)