Talk:Turkish Airlines fleet/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 20:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the ✅ tag to state when something is addressed.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Lede

 * bought over 30 cheap Douglas DC-3 and Douglas C-47s from the United States of America - presumably from the Government?  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:35, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * It's actually, not really specified in the four sources I checked (Albayrak 1983, Ayas 1990, Yurtoğlu 2016, Şekerli 2021). Only "planes from the US that were used in WWII". So yes, presumably Government (Air Force), but it's weird that none of the sources say that. I did add "used in the Second World War" to the lead.


 * I quite like the prose in the lede, but does seem a little bit more like a history section than a lede.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:35, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I'll work on it to add a paragraph about the naming and livery as well.
 * Added.

General

 * I feel like the fleet development should be the first section.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:40, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Done.


 * Tables need rowscopes.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:40, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I need a bit of help with MOS:DTAB. I figured colscope out, but rowscope is another story. I had it at some point, but was told it was wrong so I removed it.


 * I'm not the biggest fan of images that have a caption of what is in the image - there's no commentary at all.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 22:40, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I changed some captions. If you have an issue with a specific one let me know. Alt text coming later.

Review meta comments

 * I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Round 1 done. ~Styyx Talk ? 15:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)