Talk:Tusk (2014 film)

Added Background section, Premise, and External Link to IMDB
Thought this should be added, this page also needs more sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by Npabebangin (talk • contribs) 00:39, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Cult Status??
Editor TregRyder001 (talk) has been adding a line claiming that Tusk has achieved cult status. Without any references to support this, I feel that line is inappropriate, and feels like original research that is attempting to deflect attention away from the negative reviews and poor box office the film achieved upon release. Rockypedia (talk) 17:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * TregRyder001 (talk) deleted this comment without explanation. Please see WP:TALKO as to why this is unacceptable behavior.  Specifically, this part: Never edit or move someone's comment to change its meaning, even on your own talk page. Striking text constitutes a change in meaning, and should only be done by the user who wrote it or someone acting at their explicit request.  Rockypedia (talk) 00:20, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I would agree, there's more to achieving cult status than just being a box office failure. Walterego (talk) 01:20, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * While it should be referenced properly, it is in bad faith to assume the worst intentions from the editor. It could very well be cult status and the editor is simply inadequate at properly supporting via Wikipedia formality. Remember good faith and stay professional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6010:7601:7D57:A843:7169:B382:F547 (talk) 03:39, 1 January 2022 (UTC)